:: CoffeeBlog ::

Writing about food, molecular biology, and writing. Learning by doing.


You will be automatically redirected in 5 seconds, or you can click the obnoxious flashing link above.
:: welcome to CoffeeBlog :: bloghome | contact | link to me | visit my neighbors | XML/RSS
How this works

Trent Lott loses his spot, Rush Limbaugh gets booted, Greg Easterbrook is fired. Each of them for making statements that could possibly have been misinterpreted, or could be seen in a more understanding light, about relatively benign issues. Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin, however, has made and, as far as we know, is continuing to make absolutely unambiguous statements about issues that are likely to precipitate immediate terrorist attacks against U.S. citizens, as well as to further the negative image Americans are getting in other countries. He still has his job.

I have to ask: Who would you rather piss off? The American Religious Right, or all Muslims worldwide? I guess all Muslims worldwide aren't going to be voting for Bush in the coming elections, are they?

Mr. Gunn : 7:54 AM : Wednesday, October 29, 2003 :

This story in the Asia Times is just really too good to pass up. Here's a quote:

The more commercial television news you watch, the more wrong you are likely to be about key elements of the Iraq War and its aftermath, according to a major new study released in Washington on Thursday.

And the more you watch the Rupert Murdoch-owned Fox News channel, in particular, the more likely it is that your perceptions about the war are wrong, adds the report by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA).

Based on several nationwide surveys it conducted with California-based Knowledge Networks since June, as well as the results of other polls, PIPA found that 48 percent of the public believe US troops found evidence of close pre-war links between Iraq and the al-Qaeda terrorist group; 22 percent thought troops found weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq; and 25 percent believed that world public opinion favored Washington's going to war with Iraq. All three are misperceptions.

The report, Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War, also found that the more misperceptions held by the respondent, the more likely it was that s/he both supported the war and depended on commercial television for news about it.

Raw data is here.

Mr. Gunn : 6:04 PM : Tuesday, October 28, 2003 :

Wired News: The Great Library of Amazonia
Yet another way the web lowers the barriers to the presentation of your work. I wrote more about this in a previous posting. Link via Dashes sidebar.

Mr. Gunn : 10:39 AM : Sunday, October 26, 2003 :

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Listed on BlogShares